<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cyber and complexity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markwbaur.com/2009/08/04/cyber-and-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markwbaur.com/2009/08/04/cyber-and-complexity/</link>
	<description>&#34;Qui, cher monsieur, qui couchera sur le sol pour nous?&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://markwbaur.com/2009/08/04/cyber-and-complexity/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 07:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklybaur.wordpress.com/?p=340#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure exactly how well this analogy fits, but strict kinetic conflict (What bloated terminology!) is, fundamentally, the ultimate zero-sum activity, while cyber seems to rest at the opposite end of the spectrum.  The problems inherent in this realm seem to resemble complexities that continue to necessitate the counter-insurgency discipline, i.e. managing the space is as critical as &quot;defeating&quot; a specific threat.

And yeah, I was growing a bit weary of the dark theme...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly how well this analogy fits, but strict kinetic conflict (What bloated terminology!) is, fundamentally, the ultimate zero-sum activity, while cyber seems to rest at the opposite end of the spectrum.  The problems inherent in this realm seem to resemble complexities that continue to necessitate the counter-insurgency discipline, i.e. managing the space is as critical as &#8220;defeating&#8221; a specific threat.</p>
<p>And yeah, I was growing a bit weary of the dark theme&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://markwbaur.com/2009/08/04/cyber-and-complexity/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weeklybaur.wordpress.com/?p=340#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something I find fascinating in the discussion of Cyber war is the fact that, in this field, the United States is often not as clearly-dominant as we are in kinetic (to use the Times&#039; words) warfare. The trepidity defining this policy creates that much greater contrast with our conventional warfare doctrine.

I like the new theme btw, the light greens feel much calmer and welcoming than the black did, IMHO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I find fascinating in the discussion of Cyber war is the fact that, in this field, the United States is often not as clearly-dominant as we are in kinetic (to use the Times&#8217; words) warfare. The trepidity defining this policy creates that much greater contrast with our conventional warfare doctrine.</p>
<p>I like the new theme btw, the light greens feel much calmer and welcoming than the black did, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

